Research Article
Volume 2 Issue 2 - 2017
Micro Minerals Profile of Forbs and Grasses at Flowering and Seed set Stages for Grazing Ruminants in Sudan
College of Forestry and Range Sciences, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Soba, Khartoum, Sudan
*Corresponding Author: Sahar Ezzat, College of Forestry and Range Sciences, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Soba, Khartoum, Sudan.
Received: October 31, 2017; Published: November 28, 2017
Abstract
This study was conducted to determine the status of some micro minerals notably iron, copper, zinc, cobalt and nickel, in forbs and grasses in plants at the flowering and seed set stages for sheep grazing on natural range land, at Sheikan Locality, North Kordofan State, Sudan in the year 2011 and 2012.Changes in mineral concentrations with maturity often reflect increases in the proportion of stem to leaf with stems showing lower mineral concentrations than young leaves. Samples of plants’ shoots (leaves and stems) were picked randomly by hand according to diet selected by sheep and ICP was used to determine minerals. A higher concentration of micro minerals was found in forbs compared with grasses (P < 0.05). It was concluded that the rangelands of North Kordofan State, containing a mixture of grasses and forbs, are good sources of micro minerals at seed set stage of growth that can meet the requirements of sheep.
Introduction
Plants must obtain a number of inorganic mineral elements from their environment for a successful growth and development of both vegetative and reproductive tissues. These minerals serve several functions such as structural components in macromolecules, cofactors in enzymatic reactions and osmotic solutes needed to maintain proper water potential to provide charge balance in cellular compartments. Trace elements are essential parts of many physiological processes such as energy production, enzyme activity, hormone production, collagen formation, vitamin and tissue synthesis, oxygen transport and other physiological processes related to health, growth and reproduction. Their deficiency causes a variety of pathological consequences such as cardiac conditions in addition to immunological and hormonal functions and metabolic defects (Suttle, 2010). Reports on clinical Zn deficiency in cattle under field conditions in Sudan are relatively rare. The concentration of Cu was found to be low in sera and tissues of various Sudanese animals raised under nomadic system. The effect of dietary supplementation during different physiological states on serum concentrations of Cu and Zn were investigated by Abo Damir., et al. (1988).
Voluntary intake and mineral concentrations of base feedstuffs determine the level of mineral consumption. Adequate intake of forages by grazing animals is essential in meeting mineral requirements. The concentration of minerals in plants is dependent upon interactions among many factors including soil type, plant species, stage of maturity, dry matter yield, grazing management and climate (Farhad, 2012).
The currently recognized micro micro-minerals include iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), manganese (Mn), copper (Cu), boron (B), chlorine (Cl), molybdenum (Mo), selenium (Se) and nickel (Ni). These minerals generally are found at concentrations less than 0.01% of dry tissue weight (Grusak 2001). The mineral nutrients, found in the soil, are dissolved in water and absorbed through the roots of plants. There are not always enough of these nutrients in the soil for a plant to grow healthy. This is why many farmers use fertilizers to add these nutrients to the soil. Some studies determined micro element status in livestock in Eastern and Western Sudan. Mineral status should also be investigated in plants. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the stage of growth and type of plant on the trace minerals copper (Cu), iron (Fe), Cobalt (Co), Zinc (Zn) and Nickel (Ni) at Sheikan Locality, North Kordofan State, Sudan.
Methods
Sampling involved two different types of plants (forbs and grasses) at seed set stage of plant growth (early dry season) of 2010 and 2011. A total of 27 plant species (20 forbs and 7 grasses) in the flowering stage were collected from the rangelands. A total of 22 plant species (17 forbs and 5 grasses) were collected from the rangelands at seed set stage. Plants’ shoots (leaves and stems) were picked randomly by hand according to diet selected by sheep and Inductively Coupled Plasma Emission spectrometer (ICP) was used to determine minerals. Data were analyzed by using SAS package (GLM Procedure).
Results
Table 1: Concentrations of trace elements Cu, Fe, Co, Zn and Ni in forbs and grasses at flowering stage (mg/kg).
Scientific name | TP* | Cu | Fe | Co | Zn | Ni |
Colocynthis citrullus | Forb | 10.97 | 270 | 0.904 | 50.53 | 1.145 |
Echinocloa colonum | Grass | 12.70 | 1562 | 0.985 | 44.71 | 2.812 |
Seddera spp. | Forb | 10.11 | 249 | 0.223 | 29.37 | 1.261 |
Eragrostis tremula | Grass | 10.24 | 1030 | 0.529 | 67.08 | 2.418 |
Polygala eriotera | Forb | 11.46 | 1041 | 0.575 | 27.98 | 2.089 |
Crotalaria spp. | Forb | 11.01 | 755 | 0.372 | 27.85 | 1.433 |
Schoenefoldia gracilis | Forb | 9.58 | 2522 | 1.322 | 30.85 | 4.031 |
Requenia obcordata | Forb | 10.29 | 641 | 0.350 | 22.64 | 1.404 |
Justicia kotschyi | Forb | 8.10 | 1080 | 0.807 | 40.41 | 2.155 |
Cenchrus biflorus | Grass | 7.79 | 1318 | 0.664 | 32.89 | 2.726 |
Sesbania sesban | Forb | 10.77 | 231 | 0.387 | 36.26 | 2.183 |
Belpharis linarifolia | Forb | 11.94 | 1094 | 0.491 | 35.54 | 1.533 |
Chloris virgata | Grass | 8.85 | 579 | 0.682 | 42.26 | 1.816 |
Dactyloctenium aegyptium | Grass | 6.65 | 2684 | 1.274 | 32.25 | 4.582 |
Ipomoea sp. | Forb | 13.63 | 1776 | 0.926 | 38.37 | 2.881 |
Tephrosia spp. | Forb | 10.60 | 2452 | 1.251 | 27.38 | 3.705 |
Tribulus terrestris | Forb | 10.29 | 1738 | 0.999 | 26.77 | 3.191 |
Acacia nubica | Shrub | 8.55 | 228 | 0.186 | 21.37 | 1.243 |
Corchorus oiltorius | Forb | 11.48 | 1801 | 1.160 | 34.35 | 3.032 |
Indigofera aspera | Forb | 8.92 | 534 | 0.312 | 22.55 | 1.001 |
Cyprus spp. | Grass | 10.00 | 4813 | 2.272 | 23.26 | 6.568 |
Acanthus spp. | Forb | 10.23 | 2616 | 1.301 | 34.59 | 3.708 |
Indigofera spp. | Forb | 8.21 | 466 | 0.536 | 25.14 | 1.102 |
Solanum dobium | Forb | 18.41 | 1114 | 0.612 | 60.22 | 2.112 |
Dicoma tomentosa | Forb | 11.12 | 278 | 0.265 | 38.95 | 1.381 |
Farsetia longisclizua | Forb | 6.70 | 412 | 0.426 | 23.82 | 0.961 |
Ipomoea belpharosepala | Forb | 13.53 | 1937 | 1.155 | 37.04 | 3.437 |
Aristida mutablis | Grass | 9.55 | 1124 | 0.579 | 33.93 | 2.035 |
TP* = Type of plant
Table 2: Concentrations of trace elements Cu, Fe, Co, Zn and Ni in forbs and grasses at seed set stage (mg/kg).
Scientific name | TP* | Cu | Fe | Co | Zn | Ni |
Seddera spp. | Forb | 9.72 | 158 | 0.131 | 24.98 | 1.101 |
Eragrostis tremula | Grass | 9.72 | 864 | 0.555 | 43.50 | 2.553 |
Acanthospermum hespidum | Forb | 11.07 | 826 | 0.763 | 76.28 | 1.692 |
Ipomoea belpharosepala | Forb | 14.69 | 572 | 0.498 | 63.60 | 1.028 |
Colocynthis citrullus | Forb | 9.99 | 223 | 0.327 | 44.11 | 0.662 |
Cyprus spp. | Grass | 7.81 | 1897 | 0.966 | 14.21 | 2.756 |
Indigofera spp. | Forb | 9.56 | 199 | 0.132 | 22.81 | 0.915 |
Corchorus oiltorius | Forb | 11.71 | 337 | 0.281 | 53.36 | 0.985 |
Ipomoea sp. | Forb | 12.47 | 697 | 0.378 | 38.87 | 1.195 |
Cenchrus biflorus | Grass | 8.10 | 504 | 0.353 | 61.68 | 1.181 |
Abutilon glaucm | Forb | 11.97 | 501 | 0.376 | 79.40 | 1.051 |
Tephrosia spp. | Forb | 12.93 | 317 | 0.211 | 29.25 | 1.070 |
Echinocloa colonum | Grass | 16.67 | 810 | 0.539 | 71.02 | 1.621 |
Belpharis linarifolia | Forb | 11.38 | 614 | 0.308 | 33.13 | 1.001 |
Solanum dobium | Forb | 15.42 | 801 | 0.493 | 49.44 | 1.584 |
Crotalaria spp. | Forb | 11.87 | 348 | 0.181 | 26.08 | 0.643 |
Acacia nubica | Shrub | 9.33 | 280 | 0.159 | 16.45 | 1.131 |
Justicia kotschyi | Forb | 10.65 | 599 | 0.426 | 78.15 | 1.255 |
Acanthus spp. | Forb | 13.08 | 1978 | 1.082 | 45.57 | 3.215 |
Polygala eriotera | Forb | 15.48 | 759 | 0.368 | 37.55 | 1.440 |
Requenia obcordata | Forb | 10.53 | 455 | 0.235 | 34.46 | 1.238 |
Schoenefoldia gracilis | Grass | 6.59 | 301 | 0.180 | 34.27 | 0.978 |
Sesbania sesban | Forb | 12.54 | 293 | 0.287 | 35.18 | 1.899 |
TP* = Type of plant
Table 3: Trace mineral requirements (ppm) for Cattle and Sheep.
Element | Beef cattle | Sheep | ||
Requirement | Maximum Tolerable |
Requirement | Maximum Tolerable |
|
Co | 0.10 | 10 | 0.10-0.20 | 10 |
Cu | 10-15 | 100 | 7-11 | 25 |
I | 0.50 | 50 | 0.10-0.80 | 50 |
Fe | 50 | 1,000 | 30-50 | 500 |
Mn | 20-40 | 1,000 | 20-40 | 1,000 |
Mo | NA | 5 | 0.5 | 10 |
Se | 0.10 | 2 | 0.10-0.20 | 2 |
Zn | 30-40 | 500 | 20-33 | 750 |
NRC. 1996. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. (7th Ed.) National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
NRC. 1985. Nutrient Requirements of Sheep. (6th Ed.) National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
NRC. 1985. Nutrient Requirements of Sheep. (6th Ed.) National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Discussion
Table 1 illustrates the concentrations of some trace elements in forbs and grasses at flowering stage while table 2 shows the concentrations of some trace elements in forbs and grasses at seed set stage. Forbs had higher trace elements concentrations than grasses. Younger leaves and leaflets contain higher levels of minerals than older mature leaves, twigs and stem parts. These levels of micro minerals are adequate to meet the NRC (1985) requirements of sheep for Co (0.10-0.20 ppm), Cu (7-11 ppm), Fe (30-50 ppm) and Zn (30-33 ppm).Variations in the contents of Fe among forages could be partly explained by forage species’ differences and the level of Fe in the soil. Fe level in this study ranges between 200-2000 mg/kg which agrees with (Farhad, 2012) who stated that all the grazing pasture forages had higher levels of Fe than the critical content of Fe in animal tissues (between 30-50 mg·kg–1 DM). Content of Zn (22-60 mg/kg in legumes and 23-67 mg/kg in grasses) in these forages is within recommended level for sheep.
However, efficiency of Zn utilization of these forages would depend on zinc bioavailability, and its interaction with other mineral elements. Variations in the concentrations of minerals among forages in this study agreed with Hajer., et al. (2014) who attributed variations in the concentrations to genotypic differences, efficiency of mineral uptake and retention and stage of foliage maturity. Younger leaves and leaflets contain higher levels of minerals than mature leaves, twigs and stem parts. This result agrees with Burridge., et al. 1983 and Hopkins., et al. 1994 who reported that Fe, Cu, Zn, Co and Ni concentrations were higher in leguminous than in graminaceous species grown in temperate climates, with Cu and Zn being higher in mixed than in pure grass swards. The trace minerals requirements of sheep are: Co: 0.10-0.20 ppm, Cu: 7-11 ppm, Fe: 30-50 ppm and Zn: 30-33 ppm (NRC, 1985). For beef cattle the requirements are Co: 0.10 ppm, Cu: 10-15 ppm, Fe: 50 ppm and Zn: 30-40 ppm (NRC, 1996). Variations in the contents of Fe among grazing forages could be partly explained by forage species’ differences and the influence of grazing on the level of Fe in the soil.
All the grazing pasture forages had higher levels of Fe than the critical content of that mineral in animal tissues (30-50 mg/kg DM). The Zn content in these forages was sufficient for recommended requirement for sheep. However, efficiency of Zn utilization in these forages would depend on its bioavailability, and on its interaction with other mineral elements. Forage Zn concentration was also above the requirements of ruminants in winter (Farhad, 2012). Contamination of forage samples with soil is a common cause of anomalously high cobalt and iron concentrations. The uptake and availability of trace minerals is influenced by environmental factors (soil type, soil pH, plant species, season and climate). Soil and pasture in western Sudan were deficient in Cu but livestock for the most part had adequate tissue Cu levels (Hajer., et al. 2014). In this investigation most of the forage samples analyzed only meet the marginal to deficient requirements of this element.
This situation may be even further complicated by high levels of dietary Fe which can be elevated by soil ingestion during grazing. It has been also found that dietary concentrations exceeding 1g Fe/kg can profoundly reduce the availability of ingested Cu (Schillhorn and Loeffler, 1990). It was suggested that the nomadic lifestyle has prevented a Cu deficiency syndrome in animals which migrate to areas rich in Cu during part of the year (Schillhorn and Loeffler, 1990). Forage Cu content declines with forage maturity, and is higher in leaf compared with stem fractions. Copper deficiencies in forages can cause poor reproduction, broken bones, weak calves, and light color hair (Farhad, 2012). The results in tables 1 and 2 indicated that the levels of micro minerals (Fe, Cu, Zn, Co and Ni) in all plant species (grasses and forbs) in this study were within the limits of the normal values (NRC, 1985) for sheep. Overall, cattle and sheep can possibly have adequate mineral nutrition in the dry season by selectively grazing among the mixture of grasses and forbs.
Conclusion
The results reported in the present study provide some information to assist in judging animal performance as related to the deficiencyof these elements. It is recommended that further studies should be done to determine the profile of trace elements in animals at slaughter in different regions of the Sudan to monitor the possible risk of livestock trace elements deficiency/poisoning by determining the highest/lowest levels ofminerals detected in animal tissue.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to express their appreciation to the Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants - Julius Kühn-Institut, in Braunschweig, Germany for technical support and for giving us the absolute access to the laboratory.
The authors wish to express their appreciation to the Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants - Julius Kühn-Institut, in Braunschweig, Germany for technical support and for giving us the absolute access to the laboratory.
References
- Abo Damir H., et al. “Clinical zinc and copper deficiencies in cattle of Western Sudan”. Tropical Animal Health and Production20.1 (1988): 52-56.
- Burridge JC., et al. “Soil factors and treatments affecting trace elements in crops and herbage. In: Suttle, N.F., Gunn, R.G., Allen, W.M., Linklater, K.A. and Wiener, G. (eds) Trace Elements in Animal Production and Veterinary Practice”. British Society of Animal Production Occasional Publication 7 (1983): 77-86.
- Farhad M. “Minerals profile of forages for grazing ruminants in Pakistan”. Open Journal of Animal Sciences 2.3 (2012): 133-141.
- Grusak MA. “Plant Macro- and Micronutrient Minerals”. Encyclopedia of life sciences and 2001 Nature Publishing Group (2001):
- Hajer II., et al. “Mineral Profile of Sheep and Goats Grazed Natural Pasture in Nyala Locality, Western Sudan”. Journal of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences 15.1 (2014):
- National Research Council. “Nutrient requirements of Beef cattle.7th Ed”. National Academy press. Washington. D. C (1996):
- NRC. National Research Council. “Nutrient Requirements of Sheep, 6th Ed”. National Academy Press, Washington, D. C (1985):
- Schillhorn TW and Loeffler IK. “Mineral Deficiency in Ruminants in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Review”. Tropical Animal Health and Production 22 (1990): 197-205.
- Suttle NF. “The Mineral Nutrition of Livestock, CABI Publishing, London, UK, 4th edition”. (2010):
Citation:
Sahar Ezzat., et al. “Micro Minerals profile of Forbs and Grasses at Flowering and Seed set Stages for Grazing Ruminants in
Sudan”. Innovative Techniques in Agriculture 2.2 (2017): 358-363.
Copyright: © 2017 Sahar Ezzat., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.