Research Article
Volume 1 Issue 1 - 2017
Associated Risk Factors of Coccidiosis in Poultry in District Layyah, Pakistan
1Poultry Production, L & DD, Layyah, Pakistan
2Poultry Production, L & DD, Sialkot, Pakistan
3Disease Diagnostic Laboratories, L & DD, Bahawalpur Division, Pakistan
4Disease Diagnostic Laboratories, L & DD, Multan Division, Pakistan
5Disease Diagnostic Laboratories, L & DD, Sargodha Division, Pakistan
6Sultan Feeds,Sargodha, Pakistan
7Provincial Diagnostic Laboartories, L & DD, Lahore, Pakistan
2Poultry Production, L & DD, Sialkot, Pakistan
3Disease Diagnostic Laboratories, L & DD, Bahawalpur Division, Pakistan
4Disease Diagnostic Laboratories, L & DD, Multan Division, Pakistan
5Disease Diagnostic Laboratories, L & DD, Sargodha Division, Pakistan
6Sultan Feeds,Sargodha, Pakistan
7Provincial Diagnostic Laboartories, L & DD, Lahore, Pakistan
*Corresponding Author: Sohail Manzoor, Disease Diagnostic Laboratories, L & DD, Multan Division, Pakistan.
Received: April 21, 2017; Published: June 01, 2017
Abstract
The present study was under taken to evaluate the incidence of Coccidiosis and its association with various risk factors in poultry
in District Layyah, Punjab, Pakistan. A total number of 500 specimens comprising of 250 gut samples and 250 fecal droppings were
collected from chicks of different poultry farms in District Layyah. The microscopic examination of gut samples revealed overall
48.4% (n = 121/250) incidence of Coccidiosis and 50% (n = 125/250) faecal droppings were found positive for coccidial oocysts. The
prevalence of Coccidiosis infections among adult chickens were 39.83% and among young chickens was 59.09%. The prevalence of
coccidiosis was highest in the month of September (68.42 %) while lowest during December (34.78%).The prevalence of coccidiosis
was higher on the farms having poor managemental practices (sanitation and medication), particularly litter moisture. A strong
correlation was seen between the prevalence of coccidiosis and age of chicken. The difference was attributed to the managerial and
environmental conditions especially due to climate change.
Keywords: Associated Risk Factors; Poultry; Coccidiosis; Eimeria & Prevalence
Introduction
Poultry sector is one of the most vibrant segments of the livestock sector in Pakistan. This sector provides employment (Direct/Indirect) to over 1.5 million people. Pakistan has become the 11th largest poultry producer in the world. Poultry today has been a harmonizing force to keep check on the prices of mutton and beef, but also serving as backbone of agriculture sector. The poultry has contributed 1.4 percent in GDP of the country during 2015-2016. While its contribution in agriculture and livestock value added stood at 6.9 percent and 11.7 percent respectively. (Annonymus 2015-16). Commercial poultry in Pakistan was started in 1963 (Mohsin., et al. 2008). Commercial poultry farming is one of the most flourishing industry in Pakistan and it provides the cheapest source of animal protein (Ahmed., et al. 2011). However it has been prone to threats including viral, bacterial and parasitic diseases involving GIT system of the birds. (Hafez., et al. 2011). Among these parasitic diseases, coccidiosis is the main obstruction in the development of poultry sector in the country (Ayaz., et al. 2003). On the basis of its location in the gut, it is characterized by diarrhoea, cecal hemorrhages and anemia (Gardinar,1955) Intestinal coccidiosis caused by number of parasites such as Eimeria necatrix, E.acervulina, E.maxima, E.brunetti, E.mitis, E.mivati, E.praecox and E.hagani.(Lilie., et al. 2009). E.tenella, E.maxima, E.brunetti, E.necatrix are regarded as highly pathogenic while E.acervulina, E.mivati and E.mitis are less pathogenic and E.praecox and E.hagani are least pathogenic (Al-Natour., et al. 2002 and Nematollah., et al. 2008).
Chicks of all ages are susceptible to this infection but the disease is more prevalent in 6-8 weeks of age (Conway and McKenzie 1991 and Julie 1999). Several factors influences the prevalence of disease such as high air temperature, high animal density, high humidity, feed change, different age categories of birds (Calnek, M. 1997). Susceptible birds acquire the infection by ingesting infective (sporulated) oocysts in litter, soil, contaminated water and feed. The infected birds excrete oocysts in to the feaces and are major source of infection for other birds (McDougald. 2003). The infection can be transmitted by direct as well as indirect contact (Williams. 2002).
The infected oocyst can also be spread by dust, equipment, insects, rodents, wild birds as well as humans (Dimitrijevie and Ilie. 2003). The disease adversely effects the growth of the infected birds and cause high morbidity and mortality. (Anjum. 1990). The infection can be controlled by good management including dry and clean litter and good ventilation (Jordan. 1995) Since 1950s the control of coccidiosis has been achieved through anticoccidial compounds in the feed which reduce infection to a subclinical level (Danforth. 1998).
The proliferation of poultry farms and increasing interest in the poultry production, it is pertinent to continually evaluate the prevalence of poultry diseases such as coccidiosis in Layyah, Punjab, Pakistan. The efforts of this work is to expand the knowledge of the epidemiology of coccidial infection in poultry farms having open sheds by studying the geographical distribution of coccidial infections at district Layyah.
Materials and Methods
Study Area: The present study, was designed, to determine the prevalence of coccidiosis and associated risk factors in poultry of district Layyah, Punjab, Pakistan. The city has 148 meter elevation from the sea. The District is plain arid area with a unique Tehsil of Choubara consisting of sand dunes. The city is lying on the east of river Indus. Layyah has extreme hot and cold climate throughout its area. The poultry fecal samples were collected during July 2016 to December 2016.
Sample Collection: Two stage cluster sampling was done taking union councils as primary unit and poultry farms as secondary units. For this purpose out of 48 union councils 30 union councils were selected randomly. A total of 250 gut samples of broiler chicken were collected in polythene bags from different poultry farms of district Layyah. Fresh faecal droppings (n = 250) were collected in polythene bags from poultry farms of different union councils of district Layyah, from July 2016 to December 2016. First layer of faecal sample was removed as contaminated with sand etc. Both gut samples (n = 250) and faecal samples (n = 250) samples were processed in the disease diagnostic laboratory, district Layyah.
Questionnaires were designed to collection the information regarding potential risk factors associated positively or negatively with prevalence of parasitism in poultry. Information regarding age, area, season, management practices, like watering methods, feeding methods, nature of litter, frequency of change of litter etc. were collected through predesigned questionnaire. Birds of age 3-4 weeks, ranked as young, while birds of age 6 weeks and above were considered as adults.
Examination of Gut Samples: All the intestines and ceca were examined carefully for the presence of external lesions. The intestines were cut, opened and the gut contents were examined by direct smear method for the presence of Eimeria oocysts (Soulsby, 1982). The results for the presence or absence of Eimeria oocysts were recorded. If no oocysts found on three microscopic slides of the samples, it was recorded as negative sample.
Microscopic Examination
The fecal samples were soaked overnight at 37°C in 2.5% (W/V) aqueous solution of Potassium Dichromate. The samples were shaken vigour sly to break up the feces. The suspension was filtered through a cheese cloth in to beaker. The filtrate obtained was centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 minutes to settle down the oocysts. The supernatant fluid was discarded and the Eimeria oocysts present in the sediment were separated using floatation technique and then examined carefully through microscope using oil emersion lens for the presence of Eimeria oocysts. (Levine .1985).
The fecal samples were soaked overnight at 37°C in 2.5% (W/V) aqueous solution of Potassium Dichromate. The samples were shaken vigour sly to break up the feces. The suspension was filtered through a cheese cloth in to beaker. The filtrate obtained was centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 minutes to settle down the oocysts. The supernatant fluid was discarded and the Eimeria oocysts present in the sediment were separated using floatation technique and then examined carefully through microscope using oil emersion lens for the presence of Eimeria oocysts. (Levine .1985).
Data Analysis: The prevalence of coccidiosis among different seasons and age groups was calculated. Data generated was analysed using descriptive statistics with emphasis on percentage
Results and Discussion
Out of 250, gut samples examined 48.4% guts were found infected [Table 1].The present study revealed moderately low prevalence rate of coccidiosis in broiler chickens in district Layyah, as compared to the previous report (71.8 %) on coccidiosis from Faisalabad District (Khan., et al. 2006) This difference could be due the existence of more humid weather in district Faisalabad, Pakistan, because, it is well known fact that, humidity plays a vital role for the sporulation of coccidial oocysts (Huge., et al. 2008 and Bachya., et al. 2012). In Pakistan, mostly salinomycin is used as anticoccidial drug for the control of avian coccidiosis and due to its frequent use for a long time, resistance could have developed (Abbas., et al. 2011, Gyorke., et al. 2013). The disease was observed among in all six months (Table 1). Among different months maximum coccidiosis was observed during the month of September 2016. This might be because of the high level of moisture during this month of the year. Higher humidity in August and September helped sporulation of oocysts which ultimately resulted in peak prevalence during these months. These results are in consonance with some of the previous reports (khan., et al. 2006) in which maximum occurrence of coccidiosis was reported during these months due to high humidity. A previous study (Amin., et al. 2014), the seasonal prevalence of Eimeriosis in broiler chickens in Abbottabad, Pakistan had been reported the highest percentage of infection during the months of August and September. Bachya., et al. in also observed the highest predominance of coccidiosis during the month of September in Pakistan. Hirani., et al. also indicated highest incidence during moon soon season in India, indicating seasonal influence on the prevalence of disease.
Sr. No | Months | No. of Gut Samples Examined | No. of Gut Samples Tested | Prevalence (Percentage) |
1 | 7/2016 | 39 | 15 | 38.46 |
2 | 8/2016 | 58 | 27 | 46.55 |
3 | 9/2016 | 57 | 39 | 68.42 |
4 | 10/2016 | 24 | 11 | 45.83 |
5 | 11/2016 | 49 | 21 | 42.85 |
6 | 12/2016 | 3 | 8 | 34.78 |
Total | 250 | 121 | 48.4% |
Table 1: Prevalence of Coccidiosis in suspected guts of broiler chickens during different months.
Sr. No | Month | No.of Fecal Sample Examined | Young Chicks* | Adult Chicks* | ||||
Samples Examined |
Infected | Samples Examined | Infected | |||||
No. | % | No | % | |||||
1 | 7/2016 | 45 | 25 | 15 | 60 | 20 | 6 | 30 |
2 | 8/2016 | 35 | 20 | 12 | 60 | 15 | 5 | 33.33 |
3 | 9/2016 | 42 | 17 | 12 | 70.58 | 35 | 13 | 52 |
4 | 10/2016 | 43 | 25 | 16 | 64 | 18 | 8 | 44.44 |
5 | 11/2016 | 45 | 22 | 13 | 59.09 | 23 | 10 | 43.47 |
6 | 12/2016 | 40 | 23 | 10 | 43.47 | 17 | 5 | 29.41 |
Total | 250 | 132 | 78 | 59.09 % | 118 | 47 | 39.83 % |
*Young (3-4 weeks) and *Adult (5 weeks and above)
Table 2: Prevalence of coccidiosis in different age groups of Broiler chickens (Faecal droppings).
Table 2: Prevalence of coccidiosis in different age groups of Broiler chickens (Faecal droppings).
The findings of the microscopic examination of fecal droppings are represented in [Table 2]. Month wise prevalence of fecal droppings showed higher infection in September followed by October. Age incidence of infection showed that chickens aged 3-4 weeks (young) were more affected than the ones aged 5 weeks and above (adult). As the age of birds increases, they develop immunity against the disease. This may be the reason why ,disease rate decreases with the increasing age of birds (Champan., et al. 1997,Uza., et al. 2001) These upshots are in accord with the conclusion of (Omer., et al. 2011) who has also observed the same pattern of infection in the Farasan Gazzelles infected with the single species of Eimeria.
Management of poultry houses plays a momentous function in the spread of coccidiosis because coccidial oocysts are omnipresent and are easily spread in the poultry house envierment. Further owing to their high reproduction potential. It is very complex to keep chickens coccidia free, especially under current intensive rearing conditions (Adhikari., et al. 2008). Oocysts sporulate readily in poultry house litter. However they can be damaged by bacteria, other organisms and ammonia that are also present and their viability can begin to reduce after three weeks (Jadhav., et al.2011).
Prevalence of coccidiosis varied by management and did not vary by flock size (Hadipour., et al. 2011). The bad management such as, wet litter, encourages oocysts sporulation. The contaminated drinkers and feeders, bad ventilation and high stocking density, can worsen the clinical signs (Ruff,1993; Al-Quraishy., et al. 2009). Therefore coccidiosis can be controlled by good management practices including good ventilation, cleaning and decontamination of drinkers and feeders, dry and clean litter, and proper stocking density in the farm (Jordan,1995; Al-Quraishy., et al. 2009).
Acknowledgment
Authors are highly thankful to the North (DI & CO Sargodha Division) and South Labs. (DI & CO Multan Division) coordinators of L & DD, Punjab for their valuable support in the collection of poultry samples from various areas and completion of this manuscript.
Authors are highly thankful to the North (DI & CO Sargodha Division) and South Labs. (DI & CO Multan Division) coordinators of L & DD, Punjab for their valuable support in the collection of poultry samples from various areas and completion of this manuscript.
References
- Adhikari A., et al. “Prevalence and Identification of Coccidian Parasite (Eimeria Spp) in Layer Chicken of Ratnanagar Municipality, Chitwan District, Nepal”. Journal of Natural History Museum 23 (2008): 45-50.
- Ahmad., et al. “Effect of different light intensities on the prodouction performance of broiler chickens”. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 31.3 (2011): 203-206.
- Al Natour MQ and Suleiman M. “Flock-level prevalence of Eimeria species among broiler chicks in northern Jordan”. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 53.4 (2002): 305-310.
- Al Quraishy S., et al. “Eimeria tenella infection among broiler chicks Gallus domesticus in Riyadh city, Saudi Arabia”. Journal of King Saud University 21.3 (2009): 191-193.
- Amin Y., et al. “Seasonal prevalence of eimeriosis in broiler chicken”. Advances in Life Sciences 1.3 (2014): 160-164.
- Anjum A D. “Prevalence of poultry diseases in and around Faisalabad and their relationship to weather”. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 10.1 (1990): 42-45.
- Anonymous (2015-2016). Economic Survey of Pakistanpp:41.
- Ayaz., et al. “Prevalence of Coccidiosis in Broiler Chickens in Faisalabad, Pakistan”. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 23 (2003): 51-52.
- Bachya., et al. “Predominance and detection of different Eimeria species causing coccidiosis in layer chickens”. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 22.3 (2012): 597-600.
- Champan HD. “Biochemical, genetic and applied aspects of drug resistance in Eimeria parasites of the fowl”. Avian Pathology 26.2 (1997): 221-224.
- Calnek, M. “Diseases of Poultry” Iowa State University Press, Ames, (1997).
- Conway DP and McKeinze ME “Poultry Coccidiosis diagnostic and testing procedurs 2nd edition”. Chapter 2 (1991): 17-36.
- Danforth HD. “Use of live oocyst vaccines in the control of avian Coccidiosis: experimental Studies and Field Trials”. International Journal for Parasitology 28.7 (1998): 1099-1109.
- Dimitrijevic S and Ilic T. “Kokcidioza zivine,monogrfija,Fakulter veterinarske medicine”. Univerzitet u Beogradu 2003.
- Gyorke A., et al. “Prevalence and Distribution of Eimeria spp. in broiler chicken Farms of different Capacities” Parasite 20. (2013): 50.
- Gardinar JL. “The Severity of Cecal Coccidiosis Infection in Chickens as Related to the Age of the Host and the Number of Oocysts Ingested”. Poultry Science 34.2 (1955): 515-520.
- Hadipour MM., et al. “Prevalence of Eimeria Species in Scavenging native chickens of Shiraz,Iran”. African Journal of Microbiology Research 5.20 (2011): 3296-3299.
- Hafez HM. “Enteric Diseases of Poultry with Special Attention to Clostridium perfringens” Pakistan Veterinary Journal31.3 (2011): 175-184.
- Hirani ND. et al. “Epidemiological and Clinc-Pathological studies in Gujrat” Journal of Veterinary Parasitology 25.1 (2011): 42-45.
- Haug A., et al. “Coccidial infections in commercial broilers: epidemiological aspects and comparison of Eimeria species identification by morphometric and polymerase chain reaction techniques.” Avian Pathol 37.2 (2008): 161-170.
- Jadhav BN., et al. “Study of Eimeria necatrix in broiler chicken from Aurangabad District of Maharashtra state India”. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research1.11 (2011).
- Julie DH. “Coccidiosis in Poultry”. Livestock Poultry Health Program’s 2 (1999): 3-4.
- Jordan FTW. “Poultry Diseases 3rd Ed”. Cambridge University Press (1995): 226-236.
- Khan MQ., et al. “Eimeriosis in Poultry of Rawalpind/Islamabad area”. Pakistan veterinary journal 26 (2006): 85-87.
- Lilic S., et al. “Coccidiosis in poultry industry”. Literatura za Tehnologiju mesa 50 (2009): 90-98.
- Levine ND. “Veterinary Protozology”. Iowa State University Press,Ames,Iowa,USA (1985).
- Mohsin AQ., et al. “Profitability analysis of broiler production in Rawalpindi district”. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 45.4 (2008): 2998-30001.
- McDougald LR. “Coccidiosis.In.Diseases of Poultry 11th edition”.
- Saif YM., et al. (Eds)Iowa, State Press, Blackwell Pubblishing Company,USA (2003) :974-991.
- Nematollah A., et al. “Prevalence of Eimeria spp.among broiler chicks in Tabriz (Northwest of Iran)”. Research Journal of Poultry Sciences 2.3 (2008): 72-74.
- Omer SA., et al. “A New Coccidian Parasite (Eimeria farasanii n. sp.) Indicates Parasite-Host Specificity in Endemic Farasan Gazelle”. International Journal of Zoological Research 7 (2011): 85-92.
- Ruff MD. “External and Internal Factors affecting the severity of avian coccidiosis”. In Proc.6th Int.Coccidiosis Conf 21.25 (1993): 73-79.
- Soulsby EJ. “Helminths,Arthropods and Protozoans of Domesticated Animals ,7th Edition,Bailler Tindal,London,pp”. Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 78.3 (1982): 329.
- Uza DV., et al. “An assesment of the disease and prodouction status of indigenous poultry in Benue and Nassarwa sates of Nigeria”. Proc.26th Ann.Conf.Nig.Soc.Anim.Prod.Zaria,Nigeria 26 (2001): 73-75.
- Williams RB. “Anticoccidial vaccines for broiler chickens: pathways to success”. Avian Pathology 31.4 (2002): 317-353.
Citation:
Sohail Manzoor., et al. “Associated Risk Factors of Coccidiosis in Poultry in District Layyah, Pakistan”. Clinical Biotechnology
and Microbiology 1.1 (2017): 34-38.
Copyright: © 2017 Sohail Manzoor., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.