Research Article
Volume 1 Issue 3 - 2017
A Report of Powdery Mildews on Cucumbers in Village Nomal, Gilgit Baltistan (GB) – Pakistan
Department of Plant Pathology, the University of Agriculture Peshawar Pakistan
*Corresponding Author: Abbas Aqleem, Department of Plant Pathology, the University of Agriculture Peshawar Pakistan. E mail: aqlpath@gmail.com
Received: September 26, 2017; Published: October 06, 2017
Abstract
Cucumber is the most important vine crop and widely grown in Gilgit Baltistan (GB) Pakistan. The present study was conducted in open fields of cucumbers of village Nomal of GB. Cucumbers were found to be severely infected by cucumber powdery mildews (CPM) disease. The village Nomal has been divided into five major sectors i.e. Sigal, Das, Batot, Jigot and Majini (In local language called Mohallahs). In each sector five fields were randomly selected. In each field twenty plants were randomly selected and observed for the presence of powdery mildews. The disease severity and percent disease incidence of CPM were recorded. Among the Mohallahs the highest percent disease incidence of CPM was recorded in cucumber fields of Majini Mohallah with a value of 60% followed by Batot (58%), Jigot (49%) and Das (43%) Mohallahs respectively. However the minimum percent disease incidence of CPM was recorded in Sigal (37%) Mohallah. It can be concluded that open fields of cucumbers in Majini Mohallah were severely infected by CPM diseases.
Keywords: Cucumber; Cucumber powdery mildews (CPM); Gilgit Baltistan; Nomal; % disease Incidence
Introduction
Cucumber (Cucumis satius L) is the most important vine crop among gourd family (Cucurbitaceae). Cucumber is consumed as a delicious raw green fruit, used in salads and pickles and also cooked as vegetable (Qudsia., et al. 2017). In Pakistan it was cultivated on area of 3397 ha with a total production of 142876 tones (FAO, 2016). Cucumber is also widely grown in open fields of Gilgit Baltistan (GB) region of Pakistan. Growers of GB are cultivating high-yielding local varieties of cucumbers. However, in the recent years, the severity of fungal disease in particular cucumber powdery mildews (CPM) have increased.
These cucumber powdery mildews (CPM) reduce the yield (20-40%) and quality of cucumbers by interfering with the physiological functions such as photosynthesis and respirations (Queiroga., et al. 2008; Lamsal., et al. 2011). Initially, whitish powdery growth of powdery mildews appears on the lower leaves surfaces, petioles and stems of cucumber crop (Zitter., et al. 1996; El-Naggar., et al. 2012). Later it becomes so severe, causes extensive premature defoliation of leaves, and wipes out the entire crop. These mildews also reduce the size of fruits, cause inadequate fruit ripening and poor flavor development (McGrath, 1996; Nunez-Palenius., et al. 2012).
The CPM are a group of pathogen primarily caused by the two obligate biotrophic polyphagous fungi; Podosphaera xanthii and Golovinomyces cichoracearum (Braun 1995). The two species are morphologically different but can be difficult to distinguish visually (Björling., et al. 1991). The Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is used for precise differentiation of both species (Chen., et al. 2008). G. cichoracearum usually cause powdery mildew at a lower temperature and therefore appears in spring or early summer (Aguiar., et al. 2012). However the P. xanthii, mostly causes severe infection in summer (Rur., et al. 2017).
The environmental factors which directly affect the development of CPM are temperature, humidity, and light. The disease is favored by moderate temperature, vigorous plant growth and relatively high humidity (Jarvis., et al. 2002).
The most favorable conditions for disease development are 35°C and high relative humidity of more than 70% (Ali., et al. 2013). These mildews are controlled by growing disease tolerant or resistant cucumbers varieties, however, development of such varieties need time and skillful plant breeders and appearance of new races of the pathogen may break the resistant of such varieties (Zijlstra, S, and Groot, 1992; Kusch and Ralph, 2017). Biological control involves the use of bio-pesticides or biological control agents against the powdery mildews (Tanaka., et al. 2017). However, due to unavailability and high-cost, biological control agents or biopesticides are not commonly used by growers of GB. Some of the growers applied fungicides as preventive (He., et al. 2017) prior to the appearance of powdery mildews. Most of the growers are applying ash to manage these mildew diseases however ash does not give promising results. Recently CPM have become so severe in cucumber of GB, therefore, there is an urgent need of integrated disease management (IDM) of CPM. Here we report the percent disease incidence and disease severity of CPM of cucumbers fields of village Nomal, GB Pakistan.
Materials and Methods
Survey for disease severity of powdery mildews of cucumbers was carried out in July-August, 2017 at open fields of Village Nomal, Gilgit-Baltistan Pakistan. High yielding local varieties were commonly grown. Sowing was carried out on 15 June 2017 at the density of 1 or 2 plants per meter square. The row to row and plant to plant distance was somehow maintained. Irrigation was applied directly from the water channels after 5 or 6 days interval depending on the requirement of cucumber plants. During sowing, fertilizers were broadcasted based on recommended rates. Village Nomal was divided into five Mohallahs (sectors).
Mohallah Jigot, Mohallah Batot, Mohallah Das, Mohallah Sigal and Mohallah Majini.
From each sector/mohallahs, five fields were randomly selected. Within each filed twenty plants were randomly selected to observe the presence of powdery mildew. The disease severity (percentage of the leaf surface covered with powdery mildew symptoms) was evaluated based on the scale of 0 to 6 as shown in Table 1 (Yan., et al. 2006).
From each sector/mohallahs, five fields were randomly selected. Within each filed twenty plants were randomly selected to observe the presence of powdery mildew. The disease severity (percentage of the leaf surface covered with powdery mildew symptoms) was evaluated based on the scale of 0 to 6 as shown in Table 1 (Yan., et al. 2006).
Ratings | Percent area covered by pustules of powdery mildews |
0 | No visible pustule |
1 | Pustules on less than 1% of the leaf surface |
2 | 1 to 5% leaf surface covered with a pustule |
3 | 6 to 20% leaf surface covered with pustule |
4 | 21 to 40% leaf surface covered with pustule |
5 | 41 to 60% leaf surface covered with pustule |
6 | > 60% of leaf surface covered with pustule |
Table 1: Disease severity scale for Powdery mildews of cucumbers.
Moreover percent disease incidence of CPM was calculated by randomly selecting twenty plants from each field By the following formula:
Infected Plants
% incidence = --------------------------- x 100
Tested Plants
% incidence = --------------------------- x 100
Tested Plants
Statistical analysis
The least significant difference (LSD) between two means were calculated.
The least significant difference (LSD) between two means were calculated.
Results and Discussion
The whitish powdery fungal growth was observed on both leaf surfaces of cucumbers (Table 2). However some plants were found to be resistant and value 0 was assigned based on severity scale. The fungal growth also appeared on the petioles and stems of cucumber plants. The whitish growth are actually conidia. The whitish growth initially appeared on the lower leaves because they were covered by upper leaves and more presence of humidity, dew or water. The leaves undersurfaces were also found to be infected with powdery mildews. Finally the leaves were withered and died (Severity value 6) as seen in Table 2.
However no infection was recorded in cucumber fruits. Among different sectors or Mohallah of village the highest percent disease incidence of powdery mildew was recorded in Majini Mohallah followed by Batot, Jigot and Das Mohallah while minimum percent disease incidence of powdery mildew was recorded in Sigal Mohallah (Table 3). The Powdery mildews severely infected cucumber fields of Majini Mohallah with the percent disease incidence (60) followed by Batot Mohallah (58) (However percent disease incidence in both Mohallahs was not statistically significant as shown in Table 3) and Jigot Mohallah (49) respectively. However in Signal and Das Mohallahs the percent disease incidence was minimum with the value of 37 and 43 respectively.
Powdery mildew is a serious and common disease of cucumbers grown both in the field and green house conditions. Previously cucumber powdery mildew was considered as an occasional problem however recently powdery mildew outbreaks has increased (Roberts and Kucharek 2005). Powdery mildews cause reductions in plant growth, premature foliage loss and reduction in yield (Mossler and Nesheim 2005). If this disease is not controlled in a timely manner, it can be severe enough to wipe out the entire cucumbers crop from the fields.
Powdery mildew of cucumbers is caused by the following three fungal species Podosphaera xanthii(syn. Sphaerotheca fuliginea auct. p.p.), Golovinomyces cucurbitacearum (syn. Erysiphe cichoracearum auct. p.p.), and Golovinomyces orontii (syn. Erysiphe cichoracearum auct. p.p.) (Jahn., et al. 2002). Each fungal species has different races and these races have the potential to attack the resistant or tolerant cultivars of cucumber plants. Various environmental factors such as temperature, relative humidity and light are directly affecting the development of powdery mildew in cucumber crops. The temperature (75-85°F) and elevated levels of relative humidity (80-95%) promote the development of powdery mildews.
To manage this disease an integrated approach using combinations of several approaches will be more effective. The approaches include Genetic resistance, application of chemical and biological fungicides, biological control as well as cultural practices. Genetic resistance is the best approach to manage powdery mildews however powdery mildews have numerous number of fungal races which break down the resistant of cucumber cultivars (Zitter., et al. 1996). Most of the fungicides to control powdery mildew are primarily preventive however they cause phytotoxictiy and also harmful to health of humans and environments. Biological control is safe to humans and environments but the problem many biological control agents have is that they require higher humidity for survival than the powdery mildews do (Hector., et al. 2006).
S. No | Severity Scale | Symptoms | |
1 | 0 | ||
2 | 1 | ||
3 | 2 | ||
4 | 3 | ||
5 | 4 | ||
6 | 5 | ||
7 | 6 |
Table 2: The disease severity based on symptoms of powdery mildews under field condition.
Sectors (Mohallahs) | Percent Disease Incidence in Fields | Percent Disease Incidence | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
Jigot | 45 | 50 | 50 | 55 | 45 | 49b |
Batot | 60 | 55 | 50 | 65 | 60 | 58a |
Das | 40 | 40 | 50 | 40 | 45 | 43c |
Sigal | 30 | 40 | 30 | 45 | 40 | 37d |
Majini | 55 | 60 | 50 | 65 | 70 | 60a |
*LSD (0.05) = 5.5778 Total tested plants per field = 20 |
Table 3: The percent disease incidence of CMV.
Conclusion
Cucumber powdery mildew (CPM) is a common and serious disease of cucumber crops in Gilgit Baltistan (GB) Pakistan. It is concluded that CPM has severely infected cucumber fields of Majini Mohallah as compared to other Mohallahs as aforementioned. Over the past years the incidence of CPM outbreak has increased. The whole village Nomal cucumbers fields are found to be severely infected with CPM. Timely management of this disease by applying preventive fungicides or development of resistant varieties is very important.
References
- Ali M., et al. “Nutrient supplement efficacy against powdery mildew of pumpkin (Sphaerotheca fuliginea) and its correlation with environmental factors”. International Journal of Advanced Research 1.10 (2013): 17–20.
- Aguiar BD., et al. “Fungal species that cause powdery mildew in greenhouse-grown cucumber and melon in Parana state, Brazil”. Acta Scientiarum-Agronomy 34.3 (2012): 247–252.
- Braun U. The powdery mildews (Erysiphales) of Europe Jena: Fischer (1995).
- Björling K., et al. “Kompendium i växtpatologi. Sjukdomar hos trädgårdsväxterna. Uppsala: Konsulentavd., Lantbrukshögsk, (1991):
- Chen RS., et al. “Differentiation of two powdery mildews of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) by a PCR-mediated method based on ITS sequences”. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 121.1 (2008): 1–8.
- El-Naggar., et al. “Applied approach to controlling powdery mildew disease of cucumber under plastic houses”. Pakistan Journal of Agriculture: Agricultural Engineering Veterinary Sciences 28 (2012): 52–61.
- FAO. Faostat database available from http://faostat:fao.org. Accessed date 25 June 2016.
- He Lei-ming., et al. “Activity, Translocation, and Persistence of Isopyrazam for Controlling Cucumber Powdery Mildew”. Plant Disease 101.7 (2017): 1139-1144.
- Hector G. Nuñez-Palenius., et al. “Powdery Mildew of Cucurbits in Florida”. The University of Florida Extentions (2006): 1-9.
- Jarvis W., et al. “Epidemiology of powdery mildews in agricultural ecosystems. In: Belanger RR, Bushnell WR, Dik AJ, Carver TL, editors”. The powdery mildews. a comprenhensive treatise. St. Paul: APS Press (2002): 169-199.
- Jahn M., et al. “Breeding Cucurbit Crops for Powdery Mildew Resistance. In Bélanger R, WR Bushnell, AJ Dik, TLW Carver, ed, The Powdery Mildews a Comprehensive Treatise”. The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, Minnesota (2002): 239-248.
- Lamsal Kabir., et al. “Inhibition Effects of Silver Nanoparticles against Powdery Mildews on cucumber and pumpkin”. Mycobiology39.1(2011): 26-32.
- Mossler MA and ON Nesheim. “Florida Crop/Pest Management Profile: Squash”. University of Florida IFAS Extension (2005).
- Nunez-Palenius HG., et al. “Powdery mildew of cucurbits in Florida”. University of Florida IFAS Extension (2012):
- McGrath MT. “Successful management of powdery mildew in pumpkin with disease threshold-based fungicide programs”. Plant Disease 80.8 (1996): 910-916.
- Qudsia Halima., et al. “Correlation between soil chemical characteristics and soil-borne mycoflora in cucumber tunnels”. Pakistan Journal of Botany 49.4 (2017): 1579-1583.
- Queiroga R., et al. “Produtividade e qualidade de frtos de meloeirovariandonumero de frutos e de folhas por planta”. Horticultura Brasileira 26 (2008): 209–215.
- Rur M., et al. “Screening of alternative products for integrated pest management of cucurbit powdery mildew in Sweden”. European Journal of Plant Pathology (2017):
- Roberts P and T Kucharek. “Florida Plant Disease Management Guide: Watermelon”. Electronic Data Information Source of UF/IFAS Extension, PDMG-V3-55 (2005)
- Tanaka Keijitsu., et al. “Importance of prumycin produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SD-32 in biocontrol against cucumber powdery mildew disease”. Pest Management Science (2017):
- Yan Z., et al. “Assessment of partial resistance to powdery mildew Podosphaera pannosa in a teraploid rose population using a spore suspension inoculum method”. European Journal of Plant Pathology 114.3 (2006): 301-308.
- Kusch Stefan and Ralph Panstruga. “mlo-Based Resistance: An Apparently Universal “Weapon” to Defeat Powdery Mildew Disease”. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 30.3 (2017): 179-189.
- Zitter TA., et al. “Compendium of cucurbit diseases”. APS Press (1996):
- Sierd Zijlstra and Steven P. C. Groot Search for novel genes for resistance to powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca fuliginae) in cucumber (Cucumis sativus)”. Euphytica 64.1-2 (1992): 31-37.
- Zitter TA., et al. “Compendium of cucurbit diseases”. APS Press (1996):
Citation:
Abbas Aqleem. “A Report of Powdery Mildews on Cucumbers in Village Nomal, Gilgit Baltistan (GB) – Pakistan”. Clinical
Biotechnology and Microbiology 1.3 (2017): 99-104.
Copyright: © 2017 Abbas Aqleem. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.