Research Article
Volume 2 Issue 5 - 2019
A Study of Correlation between Cervical Pap smear and Cervical Biopsy for Dignosis of Malignancy
1 Senior Resident
2Assistant Professor
3Junior Resident
4Professor, Department of obstetrics & Gynaecology, ESIC-MC & PGIMSR, Bangalore
2Assistant Professor
3Junior Resident
4Professor, Department of obstetrics & Gynaecology, ESIC-MC & PGIMSR, Bangalore
*Corresponding Author: Dr Sreelatha S, Professor, Department of obstetrics & Gynaecology, ESIC-MC & PGIMSR, Bangalore.
Received: February 18, 2019; Published: February 27, 2019
Abstract
There are several possible approaches including measures of primary and secondary prevention to suppress carcinoma cervix. Cervical cancer can be controlled to a greater extent by screening to improve morbidity and mortality. Carcinoma cervix is among a curable cancer, if identified at an early stage. Pap smear is a simple, safe, noninvasive, outdoor and effective method for detection of lesions of the cervix, which has proven to be highly effective in reducing the number of cases and the mortality from cervical carcinoma. Cervical biopsy, on the other hand is a gold standard but invasive technique.
Methods: A prospective study conducted in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ESIMC PGI MSR Bangalore, Karnataka. Data collected from 100 women attending gynec OPD at ESIMC PGISR hospital from June 2018 to December 2018. Pap smear and cervical biopsy is done for 100 women and correlation is done between Pap smear and biopsy.
Result: In our study during study period in about 100 women most of women aged between 21 to 60 years in that majority belongs to 31-40 years. In PAP SMEAR, out of 100 cases, 17% were normal, 25% were inflammation, cases of HSIL and LSIL were 23% and 15% respectively, ASCUS in 20% of women. In cervical biopsy, Chronic cervicitis were most common (56%). Normal findings in 15%. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia I (CIN I), CIN II and CIN III cases were 12%, 04% and 05% respectively.
Out of 8% cases of malignancies, 6% and 2% were Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma respectively. Among 17 normal Pap smear cases, more common were cervicitis (10%) and 4% were CIN1. Most of inflammatory Pap smear showed features of cervicitis (22%) and CIN1 and CIN2 were one each. Out of 15 cases of LSIL, 10% were cervicitis, CIN1 and CIN2 were two each. Out of 23 cases of HSIL, CIN1 were diagnosed in 4 cases, 5 in CIN3, 6 and 2 cases were Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma respectively, which is statistically significant.
Conclusion: Pap smear is a simple, safe, noninvasive, outdoor and effective method for detection of lesions of the cervix. Conventional cervical smear is the widely used cervical cancer screening test in the world, but fails to localize the lesion. But cervical biopsy is the gold standard for its confirmation which should be carried out to confirm the findings of Pap smear and in case of strong clinical suspicion. Cytology and histopathological correlation are the important parts of quality improvement and even for the better evaluation.
Key words: Pap smear; Biopsy; Carcinoma; HSIL; LSIL; Cervix
Introduction
Cervical carcinoma is one of the most common carcinoma and is a significant cause of mortality around the world [1]. Cervical cancer is the most common cause of cancer related death in women, and it is the second most common cancer after the breast cancer worldwide [2]. In developing countries, cervical cancer comprises 90% of all genital malignancies [3]. Carcinoma cervix is among a curable cancer, if identified at an early stage [4]. Unhealthy cervix is a very common finding in our country due to poor genital hygiene, malnutrition and multiparity [5].
Papanicolaou (1928) in New York announced the era of modern diagnostic cytology, when he published an article titled “A new diagnosis of cancer”. Despite skepticism at the beginning of cytopathological era, the use of this method that is popularly known as “Pap” test is accepted as the most appropriate screening test for early detection of cancer and precancerous states of uterine cancer [6]. Pap smear has helped to identify the premalignant lesions of cervix and helped to reduce the mortality rates of cervical cancer in the developed countries [7]. But Pap smear fails to localize the lesion and even though Pap smear has become a standard screening test, cervical biopsy remains the ‘gold standard’ for the diagnosis of precancerous cervical lesion [8]. This study is done to correlate cytology findings with cervical biopsy.
Methods
A prospective study conducted in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ESIMC PGI MSR Bangalore, Karnataka. Data collected from 100 women attending gynecology OPD at ESIMC PGISR hospital from June 2018 to December 2018. Pap smear and cervical biopsy is done for 100 women and correlation is done between Pap smear and biopsy findings. Pap smear obtained from spatula and brush, smeared over slides. These Smears were stained according to Papanicolaou’s method. The cytological interpretation of the smears was made according to the new 2001 Bethesda system. Cervical biopsies were fixed overnight and were processed for paraffin block preparation. Staining was done by Hematoxylin and Eosin stain and was taken for microscopic examination. For the difficult cases, the second opinion was taken from another experienced pathologist.
Result
In our study during study period in about 100 women most of women aged between 21 to 60 years in that majority belongs to 31-40 years.
Pap smear | Number | Percentage (%) |
Ascus | 20 | 20 |
Hsil | 23 | 23 |
Lsil | 15 | 15 |
Inflamation | 25 | 25 |
Normal | 17 | 17 |
Total | 100 | 100 |
Table 1: Cervical cytology findings.
In our study in PAP SMEAR, out of 100 cases, 17% were normal, 25% were inflammation, cases of HSIL and LSIL were 23% and 15% respectively, ASCUS in 20% of women.
Cervical biopsy | Number | Percentage (%) |
Normal | 15 | 15 |
Cervicitis | 56 | 56 |
Cin1 | 12 | 12 |
Cin2 | 4 | 4 |
Cin 3 | 5 | 5 |
Scc | 6 | 6 |
Adenocarinoma | 2 | 2 |
Total | 100 | 100 |
Table 2: Cervical biopsy findings.
In cervical biopsy, Chronic cervicitis were most common (56%). Normal findings in 15%. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia I (CIN I), CIN II and CIN III cases were 12%, 04% and 05% respectively. Out of 8% cases of malignancies, 6% and 2% were Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma respectively.
Cervical biopsy | Normal | Cervicitis | CIN | SCC | Adenocarcinoma | Total | ||
Pap smear | I | II | III | |||||
Ascus | 6 | 12 | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | 20 |
Hsil | 4 | 2 | 4 | - | 5 | 6 | 2 | 23 |
Lsil | 1 | 10 | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | 15 |
Inflamation | 1 | 22 | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | 25 |
Normal | 3 | 10 | 4 | - | - | - | - | 17 |
Total | 15 | 56 | 12 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 100 |
Table 3: Correlation between cervical cytology and cervical biopsies.
Among 17 normal Pap smear cases, more common were cervicitis (10%) and 4% were CIN1. Most of inflammatory Pap smear showed features of cervicitis (22%) and CIN1 and CIN2 were one each. Out of 15 cases of LSIL, 10% were cervicitis, CIN1 and CIN2 were two each. Out of 23 cases of HSIL, CIN1 were diagnosed in 4 cases, 5 in CIN3, 6 and 2 cases were Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma respectively, which is statistically significant.
Discussion
Cervical carcinoma is the second most frequent cancer worldwide, in females. But the invasive cervical carcinoma is considered to be a preventable condition due to its association with a long pre invasive stage (CIN) making it amenable to screening [9] Pap smear has become the main screening tool for the detection of cervical pathology [10]. The American Cancer Society, National Cancer Institute, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists recommend that all sexually active women above the age of 18 years should have annual Pap smear for three consecutive years. In case of three consecutive negative pap smears, the test can be extended for 3- 5 years [11,12].
Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women, comprising of approximately 12% of all cancers, and being the most common in developing countries [13]. Globally, 500,000 new cases are diagnosed annually and 280,000 women die of the disease [14].
A prospective study conducted in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ESIMC PGI MSR Bangalore, Karnataka. Data collected from 100 women attending gynecology OPD at ESIMC PGISR hospital from June 2018 to December 2018.
In our study, inflammatory smear (25%) is most common finding in PAP, which correlates with Dhakal., et al. (27.9%) and Mainali N., et al. (36%). In our study LSIL and HSIL is 15% and 23% respectively which correlates with Chandrakala., et al. [17] 17% and 12% respectively. In our study chronic cervicitis (56%) is most common in biopsy which correlates with Zainab., et al. [18], Dhakal., et al. [15] and Mainali N., et al. [16] which is 69%, 78.7% and 66% respectively. In our study CIN1, CIN2, CIN3 is 12%, 4% and 5% respectively which correlates with Mainali N., et al. 10%, 5% and 6% respectively and Dhakal., et al. CIN 3 6.7%.
Squamous cell carcinoma in our study is 6% which correlates with 4% of Dhakal., et al. Adenocarcinoma is 2% which correlates with 1.7% of Mainali N., et al. In our study out of 15 cases if LSIL in pap smear, biopsy revealed 4 cases of CIN which correlates with Vijay., et al. [19]. In our study out of 23 cases of HSIL in PAP, biopsy revealed 9 cases of CIN, 6 cases of SCC and 2 cases of Adenocarcinoma, which correlates with Dhakal., et al. study, which shows that Pap smear is statistically significant in detecting the high grade dysplasia and above.
Conclusion
Pap smear is a simple, safe, noninvasive, outdoor and effective method for detection of lesions of the cervix. Conventional cervical smear is the widely used cervical cancer screening test in the world, but fails to localize the lesion. But cervical biopsy is the gold standard for its confirmation which should be carried out to confirm the findings of Pap smear and in case of strong clinical suspicion. Cytology and histopathological correlation are the important parts of quality improvement and even for the better evaluation.
References
- Ferlay J., et al. “Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012”. International Journal of Cancer 136.5 (2015): 359-386.
- Shafi MI. Premalignant and Malignant disease of the cervix. In: Edmond DK. ed. Dewhurt’s Text book obstetrics and gynaecology for post graduates. 6th Ed. New York: Blackwell Science (1999): 572-581.
- Dutta DC, Text Book of gynaecology. 4th Ed. New Delhi: New Central Book Agency (2004): 1-23.
- Peto J., et al. “The cervical cancer epidemic that screening has prevented in the UK”. Lancet 364 (2004): 249-256.
- Arora R., et al. “Colposcopic evaluation of unhealthy cervix”. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 50 (2000): 102-103.
- Radović M., et al. “Uloga citopatologije u ranoj dijagnostici cervikalnog carcinoma”. Acta Medica Medianae 5 (2002): 77-89.
- Hakama M and Rasanen-Virtanen U. “Effect of a mass screening program on the risk of cervical cancer”. American Journal of Epidemiology 103 (1976): 512-517.
- Rathod GB and Disha Singla. Histopathological vs. cytological findings in cervical lesions (Bethesda system)-A comparative study. IAIM 2 (2015): 13-16.
- Ramadevi E., et al. “A study of correlation between cytology and histopathology with Colposcopic findings”. International Journal of Integrative Medical Sciences 4.4 (2017): 477-483.
- Papanicolaou GN TA. “The diagnostic value of vaginal smears in carcinoma of the cervix”. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 42 (1941):192-206.
- Mettlin C and Dodd GD. “The American Cancer Society Guidelines for the cancer-related checkup: an update”. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 41 (1991): 279-282.
- ACOG committee opinion. Routine cancer screening. Number 185, September 1997 (replaces no. 128, October 1993). Committee on Gynecologic Practice. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 59 (1997): 157-161.
- Ferlay J., et al. GLOBOCAN 2002 Cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide, IARC Press, Lyon; 2004.
- The World Health Report, 1995-Bridging the gaps. World Health Forum 16.4 (1995): 377-385.
- Dhakal R., et al. “Correlation of Cervical Pap Smear with Biopsy in the Lesion of Cervix”. Kathmandu University Medical Journal 14.55 (2016): 254-257.
- Mainali N., et al. “A correlation study of cervical cytology on Pap smear with cervical biopsy in a tertiary hospital of Eastern Nepal”. Journal of Pathology of Nepal 8 (2018):1389-1392.
- Chandrakala Joshi., et al. “Correlation of Pap Smear and Colposcopy in Relation to Histopathological Findings in Detection of Premalignant Lesions of Cervix in a Tertiary Care Centre”. International Journal of Scientific Study 3 (2015): 55-60.
- Zainab S Nayani and Pravin Chandra Hendre. “Comparison and Correlation of Pap Smear with Colposcopy and Histopathiology in Evaluation of Cervix”. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences 4.53 (2015): 9236-9247
- Bodal VK., et al. “Correlation of Pap Smear with Histopathological Findings in Malignant and non-malignant Lesions of Cervix”. Global Journal of Medical Research (2014): 19-24.
Citation:
Sreelatha S., et al. “A Study of Correlation between Cervical Pap smear and Cervical Biopsy for Dignosis of Malignancy”. Gynaecology and Perinatology 2.5 (2019): 361-365.
Copyright: © 2019 Sreelatha S., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.