Research Article
Volume 1 Issue 1 - 2016
Risk Factors of Obesity Associated With Diabetes among Selected Urban People
Department of Nutrition and Food Engineering, Daffodil International University, Dhaka
*Corresponding Author: Moonmoon Hoque, Department of Nutrition and Food Engineering, Daffodil International University, Dhaka.
Received: June 28, 2016; Published: November 12, 2016
Abstract
Introduction: Obesity is an increasing problem in the developing world and has substantial health effects. In developing countries obesity associated diseases – like diabetes increasing day by day among the urban people – that are closely related to behavioral factors – overall decrease in activity levels, consumption of high-fat diets, energy dense foods or drinks, snacking and the loss of formalized meal patterns.
Objective: This study was an attempt to assess risk factors of obesity associated with diabetes among urban people.
Methods: It was a case control study conducted among purposively selected 100 cases (obese and diabetic) and 100 controls (non-obese and diabetic). To compare the adverse effect of obesity nutritional status was determined by WHO cut off value for Asian people.
Results: Fast food intake, sweet food consumption and intake of preferred food were significantly associated with obesity among diabetic patients (p < 0.05). It was observed that complications of diabetes was significantly higher among obese diabetic patients (p < 0.05). The effect of BMI on hypertension, stroke, nephropathy, diabetic foot and retinopathy was found statistically significant and odds ratio was 26.826, 5.632, 3.576, 3.893 and 6.195 respectively.
Conclusion: Obesity was responsible for causing various complications among diabetic patients. Policy maker should be design and implement appropriate health education programme to prevent obesity and its associated complications among diabetic patients.
Keywords: Obesity; Risk factors; Diabetes and Urban people
Introduction
Diabetes mellitus is a major global health problem. World Health Organization report predicted 79.4 million diabetic patients by the year 2030 [1]. The cause of Diabetes mellitus is poorly understood. Changes in diet and life style due to rapid economic development are fore most among the principle drives of diabetes in developing and developed countries [2]. International Diabetes Congress in Helsinki, Finland reported that obesity is the most preventable and important risk factor for Diabetes mellitus Type 2 [3]. Almost four out of five people who are newly diagnosed with diabetes are obese [4]. The risk for diabetes has been reported to be about 2-folds in the mildly obese, 5 fold in the moderately obese and 10 folds in morbidly obese persons [5]. Obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and their associated long-term complications are emerging as critical [6]. Bangladesh is one of the developing countries in the world, which is facing rapid urbanization in recent time [7]. It was reported that prevalence of type 2 diabetes is on the rise more in urban areas compared to rural population in Bangladesh [8,9]. Urbanization was found to be associated with a sedentary lifestyle, higher calorie food intake and stressful condition, which might have contributed to the increasing prevalence of diabetes [10]. Based on existing literature and lived experiences gathered through semi-structured interviews this paper offers an investigation of the antecedents and consequences of Type 2 Diabetes. This investigation goes beyond the medical model of diabetes and argues that diabetes emerged as a consequence of numerous changes in urban.
Methodology
Study type: It was observational study.
Study design: Case control.
Study period: The study was carried out over a period of one year.
Study area: This study was conducted in different hospitals (Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Mitford Hospital, Anwar Khan Modern Hospital, Popular Hospital Ltd and Medinova Hospital Ltd) in Dhaka city. The study area was selected purposively.
Sample size: I had taken total 200 diabetic patients, divided into 100 obese diabetic (case) and 100 non-obese diabetic (control) patients.
Selection of sample: Non probability purposive sampling was used to collect sample
Data collection method: Personal interview was taken to collect data. Diabetic book was considered for cross check. Diabetic foot was diagnosed by clinical examination.
Inclusion criteria: All adult diabetic patients
Case: Having BMI ≥ 27 (Obese)
Control: Having BMI < 27 (Non-obese)
Data analysis: After coding and editing, data were analyzed by using Statistical Package for Social Science or SPSS (version 16.0). Obesity status was determined by BMI according to WHO cut off value for Asian people. Both descriptive (frequency, percentage etc.) and inferential (Chi-square) statistics were used to summarize data. Level of significance was considered at 5% or 0.05. Logistic regression was also done.
Study design: Case control.
Study period: The study was carried out over a period of one year.
Study area: This study was conducted in different hospitals (Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Mitford Hospital, Anwar Khan Modern Hospital, Popular Hospital Ltd and Medinova Hospital Ltd) in Dhaka city. The study area was selected purposively.
Sample size: I had taken total 200 diabetic patients, divided into 100 obese diabetic (case) and 100 non-obese diabetic (control) patients.
Selection of sample: Non probability purposive sampling was used to collect sample
Data collection method: Personal interview was taken to collect data. Diabetic book was considered for cross check. Diabetic foot was diagnosed by clinical examination.
Inclusion criteria: All adult diabetic patients
Case: Having BMI ≥ 27 (Obese)
Control: Having BMI < 27 (Non-obese)
Data analysis: After coding and editing, data were analyzed by using Statistical Package for Social Science or SPSS (version 16.0). Obesity status was determined by BMI according to WHO cut off value for Asian people. Both descriptive (frequency, percentage etc.) and inferential (Chi-square) statistics were used to summarize data. Level of significance was considered at 5% or 0.05. Logistic regression was also done.
Results
Association between fast food intake, sweet food intake, preferred food items, unit of insulin and BMI (n = 200)
Table 1 reveals that 33% obese (case) consume fast food and 17% do not consume whereas 11% non-obese (control) take fast food and 39% do not take. Statistical significant association was found between fast food intake and BMI (p < 0.05). About 33.5% obese (case) consume sweet food and 16.5% do not consume whereas 5% non-obese (control) take sweet food and 45% do not take. Statistical significant association was found between sweet food intake and BMI (p < 0.05). Obese prefer intake of cereals and oils, fish/meat, vegetables and fruits than non-obese. Statistical significant association was found between preferred food item and BMI (p < 0.05). About 30.5% obese (case) use ≥ 19 unit of insulin and 19.5% use < 19 unit of insulin whereas 31.5% non-obese (control) use < 19 unit of insulin and 18.5% use ≥ 19 unit of insulin. Association between unit of insulin and BMI is statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Table 1 reveals that 33% obese (case) consume fast food and 17% do not consume whereas 11% non-obese (control) take fast food and 39% do not take. Statistical significant association was found between fast food intake and BMI (p < 0.05). About 33.5% obese (case) consume sweet food and 16.5% do not consume whereas 5% non-obese (control) take sweet food and 45% do not take. Statistical significant association was found between sweet food intake and BMI (p < 0.05). Obese prefer intake of cereals and oils, fish/meat, vegetables and fruits than non-obese. Statistical significant association was found between preferred food item and BMI (p < 0.05). About 30.5% obese (case) use ≥ 19 unit of insulin and 19.5% use < 19 unit of insulin whereas 31.5% non-obese (control) use < 19 unit of insulin and 18.5% use ≥ 19 unit of insulin. Association between unit of insulin and BMI is statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Fast food intake | BMI | Total | χ2 | p-value | |
≥ 27 (Case) % |
< 27 (Control) % |
||||
Yes | 33 | 11 | 44 | 39.286 | 0.000 |
No | 17 | 39 | 56 | ||
Sweet food intake | |||||
Yes | 33.5 | 5 | 38.5 | 68.609 | 0.000 |
No | 16.5 | 45 | 61.5 | ||
Preferred food items | |||||
Cereals and oils | 13 | 4.5 | 17.5 | 45.561 | 0.000 |
Fish or Meat | 15.5 | 5.5 | 21 | ||
Vegetables and fruits | 12.5 | 8 | 20.5 | ||
All items | 9 | 32 | 41 | ||
Unit of insulin | |||||
≥ 19 | 30.5 | 18.5 | 49 | 11.525 | 0.001 |
< 19 | 19.5 | 31.5 | 51 |
Table 1:
Association between hypertension, stroke, nephropathy, diabetic foot, retinopathy and BMI (n = 200)
Table 2 indicates that 33.5% obese (case) suffer hypertension and 16.5% do not suffer whereas 44% non-obese (control) do not suffer hypertension and 6% suffer. Association between hypertension and BMI is statistically significant (p < 0.05). About 25.5% obese (case) have stroke and 24.5% have no stroke whereas 43% non-obese (control) have no stroke and 7% have stoke. Association between stroke and BMI is statistically significant (p < 0.05). About 19.5% obese (case) and 8% non-obese (control) have nephropathy whereas 72.5% patients both cases and controls have no nephropathy. Association between nephropathy and BMI is statistically significant (p < 0.05). About 18% obese (case) and 5.5% non-obese (control) have diabetic foot and rest of the patients have no diabetic foot. Association between diabetic foot and BMI is statistically significant (p < 0.05). About 27% obese (case) and 7% non-obese (control) have retinopathy and rest of the patients have no retinopathy. Association between retinopathy and BMI is statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Table 2 indicates that 33.5% obese (case) suffer hypertension and 16.5% do not suffer whereas 44% non-obese (control) do not suffer hypertension and 6% suffer. Association between hypertension and BMI is statistically significant (p < 0.05). About 25.5% obese (case) have stroke and 24.5% have no stroke whereas 43% non-obese (control) have no stroke and 7% have stoke. Association between stroke and BMI is statistically significant (p < 0.05). About 19.5% obese (case) and 8% non-obese (control) have nephropathy whereas 72.5% patients both cases and controls have no nephropathy. Association between nephropathy and BMI is statistically significant (p < 0.05). About 18% obese (case) and 5.5% non-obese (control) have diabetic foot and rest of the patients have no diabetic foot. Association between diabetic foot and BMI is statistically significant (p < 0.05). About 27% obese (case) and 7% non-obese (control) have retinopathy and rest of the patients have no retinopathy. Association between retinopathy and BMI is statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Hypertension | BMI | Total | χ2 | p-value | |
≥2 7 (Case) % |
< 27 (Control) % |
||||
Yes | 33.5 | 6 | 39.5 | 63.291 | 0.000 |
No | 16.5 | 44 | 60.5 | ||
Stroke | |||||
Yes | 25.5 | 7 | 32.5 | 31.202 | 0.000 |
No | 24.5 | 43 | 67.5 | ||
Nephropathy | |||||
Yes | 19.5 | 8 | 27.5 | 13.266 | 0.000 |
No | 30.5 | 42 | 72.5 | ||
Diabetic foot | |||||
Yes | 18 | 5.5 | 23.5 | 17.383 | 0.000 |
No | 32 | 44.5 | 76.5 | ||
Retinopathy | |||||
Yes | 27 | 7 | 30 | 35.651 | 0.000 |
No | 23 | 43 | 70 |
Table 2:
Risk factor estimation by binary logistic regression of BMI with complications of diabetes
The effect of BMI on hypertension, stroke, nephropathy, diabetic foot and retinopathy is found significant whereas the effect of family history is only significant on diabetic foot and physical activity is significant on hypertension. It has been observed that the odds ratio of BMI on hypertension, stroke, nephropathy, diabetic foot and retinopathy is 26.826, 5.632, 3.576, 3.893 and 6.195 respectively.
The effect of BMI on hypertension, stroke, nephropathy, diabetic foot and retinopathy is found significant whereas the effect of family history is only significant on diabetic foot and physical activity is significant on hypertension. It has been observed that the odds ratio of BMI on hypertension, stroke, nephropathy, diabetic foot and retinopathy is 26.826, 5.632, 3.576, 3.893 and 6.195 respectively.
Predictors | Complications of diabetes | ||||||||||||||
Hypertension | Stroke | Nephropathy | Diabetic foot | Retinopathy | |||||||||||
B | P value | OR | B | P value | OR | B | P value | OR | B | P value | OR | B | P value | OR | |
BMI | 3.289 | 0.000 | 26.826 | 1.728 | 0.000 | 5.632 | 1.274 | 0.001 | 3.576 | 1.345 | 0.001 | 3.893 | 1.824 | 0.000 | 6.195 |
Family history | -0.255 | 0.504 | 0.775 | 0.182 | 0.594 | 1.200 | 0.041 | 0.905 | 1.042 | 0.783 | 0.030 | 2.188 | 0.236 | 0.490 | 1.266 |
Physical activity | 1.269 | 0.011 | 3.556 | -0.371 | 0.372 | 0.690 | 0.277 | 0.483 | 1.319 | 0.071 | 0.872 | 1.073 | -0.447 | 0.284 | 0.640 |
OR=Odds Ratio
Table 3:
Table 3:
Discussion
Fast food consumption is one of the factors which have been reported as a cause of obesity. Overweight and obesity continue to increase substantially worldwide, affecting all ages, sexes and races. There is convincing evidence that increases in the energy density of the diet by fat or sugar, together with concomitant eating behaviors like snacking and eating out, promotes unhealthy weight gain through passive overconsumption of energy [11]. Statistical significant association was found between fast food intake and BMI in the present study. Availability of fast food and urban life style may be responsible for obesity. French., et al. found that an increase of only one fast food meal in a week was associated with a daily energy intake increase of 234.4 KJ and a weight gain which was over and above the average weight gain of 0.72 kg [12]. The frequent consumption of fast foods is one of the main reasons for high intake of saturated fatty acid and trans fatty acids which partially come from using hydrogenated vegetable oil [13]. This class of fatty acids can cause insulin resistance and predispose to type 2 diabetes [14]. The present study found that obese people consumed more sweet foods. Simultaneous consumption of fast food and beverages with sugar being added was found to be positively associated with BMI, and consuming full portion sizes was found to be positively associated with obesity [15]. Fruits and vegetables play an important role in improving general health. Fruit and vegetable consumption is inversely related to total and low density lipoprotein cholesterol [16]. Obese people prefer intake of cereals and oils, fish/meat, vegetables and fruits than non-obese. Physical activity is a major determinant of health and when it exceeds the minimum recommended amount, it helps in improving physical fitness, reducing the risk of chronic diseases and disability and in preventing unhealthy weight gain [17]. Obesity in association with hypertension, dyslipidemia, and hyperglycemia constitute the metabolic syndrome (MS), a well-recognized constellation of risk factors for the development of type 2 diabetes [18]. Association between hypertension and BMI is statistically significant. Globally, high blood pressure (BP) is estimated to cause 7.1 million deaths, about 13% of the total. About 62% of cerebrovascular disease and 49% of ischemic heart disease are attributable to suboptimal BP (systolic > 115mm Hg). Overweight and obesity increase the risks of high BP, coronary heart disease, ischemic stroke, type II diabetes mellitus and certain cancers. Worldwide about 58% of diabetes mellitus and 21% of ischemic heart disease are attributable to BMI above 21 kg/m2 [19]. In a study that examined ethnic differences in the strength of association between BMI and hypertension, higher prevalence of hypertension was associated with higher BMI levels in different ethnic groups [20]. Significant associations between BMI and BP have also been documented in lean Chinese populations [21]. In a prospective cohort, increasing BMI was associated with a steady increase in the risks of total, ischemic, and hemorrhagic stroke. Although concomitant hypertension and diabetes accounted for much of the increase in total and ischemic stroke, a significant increase remained after adjustment for these potential biological mediators. Although the risk of ischemic stroke was highest among smokers and individuals with hypertension, these factors did not substantially modify the relationship between BMI and stroke. Body mass index was not associated with the severity of total and ischemic stroke, but the data suggest that it might be inversely associated with severity of fatal hemorrhagic stroke, particularly subarachnoid hemorrhage. The association between excess weight and stroke risk has been controversial. Among men, few prospective studies have investigated this relationship. Some of these had small sample sizes and others did not classify stroke subtypes [22]. To my knowledge, the association between BMI and stroke severity has not been examined prospectively before. Association between stroke and BMI is statistically significant in this study. Individuals with diabetes mellitus are 17 times more likely to have an amputation as a result of peripheral vascular disease and are at an increased risk of developing nephropathy, retinopathy, and coronary heart disease, among other adverse health outcomes [23]. The present study showed similar findings. Increasing evidence suggests that obesity is a risk factor for diabetes and chronic kidney diseases. As a marker of obesity, high body mass index (BMI) has been reported to be related with diabetic nephropathy (DN) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) [24].
Conclusion
Fast food intake, sweet food consumption and intake of preferred food are the risk factors of obesity among diabetic patients. Obese patients need more insulin than non-obese. Tendency to develop hypertension was almost 27 times higher among obese diabetic patients than non-obese diabetic patients. Risk of developing stroke among obese was 6 times high. Four times higher chance of suffering from nephropathy and diabetic foot was seen among obese. Obese diabetic persons were 6 times more prone to suffer retinopathy. All complications were statistically significant.
References
- Wild S., et al. “Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030”. Diabetes Care 27.5 (2004): 1047-1053.
- Gupta R and Agrawal M. “High cardiovascular risks in a North Indian Agarwal community: a case series”. Cases Journal 2 (2009): 7870.
- WCPD. International Diabetes Congress in Helsinki, Finland (2008).
- Kissebah AH., et al. “Health risks of obesity”. Medical Clinics of North America 73.1 (1989): 111-138.
- Scheen AJ and Lefebvre PJ. “Oral antidiabetic agents. A guide to selection”. Drugs 55.2 (1998): 225-236.
- Evaristo-Neto AD., et al. “Prevalence of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance in a rural community of Angola”. Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome 2 (2010): 63.
- Laskar SI. “Urbanization in Bangladesh: Some contemporary observations”. Bangladesh Development Study 24.1 (1996): 207-216.
- Sayeed MA., et al. “Diabetes and Impaired fasting glycaemia in rural population of Bangladesh”. Diabetes Care 26.4 (2003): 1034-1039.
- Hussain A., et al. “Type 2 diabetes in rural and urban population: Diverse prevalence and associated risk factors in Bangladesh”. Diabetic Medicine 22.7 (2005): 931-937.
- Ramachandran A., et al. “Impacts of urbanization on life style and on the prevalence of diabetes in native Asian Indian population”. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 44.3 (1999): 207-213.
- Schröder H., et al. “Association of fast food consumption with energy intake, diet quality, body mass index and the risk of obesity in a representative Mediterranean population”. British Journal of Nutrition 98.6 (2007): 1274–1280.
- Mario Fernandez P and Juan S. “Fatty acid composition of commercial Spanish fast food and snack food”. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 13.3 (2000): 275-281.
- Pereira MA., et al. “Fast food habits, weight gain and insulin resistance (the CARDIA study): 15 year prospective analysis”. The Lancet 365.9453 (2005): 36-42.
- Sharkey JR., et al. “Nativity is associated with sugar-sweetened beverage and fast-food meal consumption among Mexican-origin women in Texas border colonies”. Nutrition Journal 30.10 (2011): 101.
- Greenwood JL., et al. “Creating a Clinical Screening Questionnaire for eating behaviors associated with overweight and obesity”. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 21.6 (2008): 539–548.
- Mirmiran P., et al. “Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk factors for cardiovascular disease”. Metabolism 58.4 (2009): 460–468.
- Petersen L., et al. “Longitudinal study of the long-term relation between physical activity and obesity in adults”. International journal of obesity and related metabolic disorders 28.1 (2004): 105-112.
- Reaven GM. “Insulin resistance, cardiovascular disease, and the metabolic syndrome: how well do the emperor's clothes fit?” Diabetes Care 27.4 (2004): 1011-1012.
- Colin AB., et al. “Ethnic differences in the association between body mass index and hypertension”. American Journal of Epidemiology 155.4 (2002): 346–353.
- Hu FB., et al. “Body mass index and cardiovascular risk factors in a rural Chinese population”. American Journal of Epidemiology 151.1 (2000): 88–97.
- Abbott RD., et al. “Body mass index and thromboembolic stroke in nonsmoking men in older middle age: the Honolulu Heart Program”. Stroke 25.12 (1994): 2370- 2376.
- Rhoads G and Kagan A. “The relation of coronary disease, stroke, and mortality to weight in youth and in middle age”. Lancet 1.8323 (1983): 492- 495.
- Gray N., et al. “Relation between BMI and Diabetes Mellitus and Its Complications among US Older Adults”. Southern Medical Journal 108.1 (2015): 29-36.
- Hsu CY., et al. “Body mass index and risk for end-stage renal disease”. Annals of Internal Medicine 144.1 (2006): 21-28.
Citation:
Moonmoon Hoque. “Risk Factors of Obesity Associated With Diabetes among Selected Urban People”. Nutrition and Food
Toxicology 1.1 (2016): 3-8.
Copyright: © 2016 Moonmoon Hoque. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.